If your Google Form reached capacity but one or more extra people still got through, the issue is usually not that the cap setting disappeared. The real problem is that "stop accepting responses" is not the same thing as strict real-time reservation locking.
A response cap can close the form quickly, but it cannot fully control every respondent who already opened the form a moment earlier.
Someone may already be on the form page before the close action fires.
Multiple respondents can submit close together around the same threshold.
The public form page a respondent sees is not the same thing as an operator watching the edit screen.
The form is being asked to behave like a strict booking backend, which is a stronger promise than a simple cap can make.
Internal forms, classroom use, or small signups usually work well with a normal cap and message.
If a small overage can be handled manually, a cap plus notification is often enough.
A separate waitlist or support path reduces confusion when the form is full.
Email alerts help the owner react quickly instead of discovering the issue late.
If each spot is high value and concurrency matters, build around the limitation instead of pretending it does not exist.
Use a lower public cap and a waitlist if many people may rush the form at once.
Per-role limits help, but final staffing may still need manual review.
Treat full slots as a quota workflow, not a promise of inventory-grade locking.
If one extra acceptance causes real downstream cost, plan human review around the form.
These guides are the most useful follow-ups for overflow and full-form behavior.